Asus Eee Versus Raon Digital Everun

September 15, 2007

Yow!

asuseverun001.jpg

asuseverun002.jpg

— photoswipe via UMPC Fever

Previously in the blog:
Asus Eee: More About Its Keyboard
Asus Eee: The New Timex-Sinclair?!!?
Asus Eee: OS X?!
Asus Eee: XP Runs!
New Asus Eee Article
Asus Eee: Increasing RAM Possible
Asus Eee: OK. Wait. What’d He Just Say?!!?
Asus Eee And Palm PDAs
Asus Eee = Flybook = RSI
Blog Notes: Yes, I’m Working On It!
Two Days Before iDay, Has My Heart Been Stolen Away From The iPhone?
Raon Digital Announces Vega Successor
I Blame Him For The Lack Of An Updated Vega


Quote Of The Day: Le Grande Fraud

September 14, 2007

Ex-ABC consultant said to fake interview

I am falling from the moon.

Oh this is so good…

A former ABC News consultant fired last year because he couldn’t authenticate academic credentials is at the center of a new dispute over apparently faked interviews with Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Bill Gates and others.

The consultant, Alexis Debat, quit the Nixon Center, a Washington think tank, on Wednesday after Obama’s representatives claimed an interview with the senator appearing under Debat’s byline in the French magazine Politique Internationale never took place. The interview quoted the Democratic presidential candidate as saying the Iraq war was “a defeat for America.”

Pelosi, Gates, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg all said they never gave interviews that appeared in the magazine under Debat’s byline, ABC News’ Web site, the Blotter, reported on Thursday.

…you don’t know how tempted I am to say, You can’t make this up!

Apparently, you can!

I wonder what words he had come out of Bill Gates’ mouth?


Will Palm Die Or Show Others How To Be Reborn?

September 13, 2007

palmpromo01.jpg
palmpromo02.jpg
palmpromo03.jpg

Can Palm find a way to survive?

As he stood up to boast of his latest creation, Palm founder Jeff Hawkins had no doubts about its bright future. “Foleo represents a whole new product direction both for Palm and for mobile computing,” he enthused ahead of the device’s launch in May. “In my opinion, the Foleo is going to be most successful and the most significant product that Palm has done.”

A month on, Ed Colligan, president and chief executive of Palm, was still keen to back up Hawkins’s grand vision. Foleo represented “the dawning of another major design era of mobile computing”, Colligan told analysts, even though he admitted that initial sales were likely to be slow. Worries about Foleo’s future then set in. By the start of this month, instead of being shipped to stores, the Foleo project had been cancelled.

To observers it was yet another example of Palm struggling, as it has for years, to regain the lead it once held as the world’s premier maker of handheld (or “palmtop”) computers.

I must quote myself:

Palm could have never developed the iPhone. Because it didn’t fit into what they were taught so long ago. Zoomer owners wound up creating a sort of design religion that’s hardened into a crust of fundamentalism at Palm. It explains why Palm has been so hard of hearing towards its users: we are like infidels and they are like Muslim clerics! Only they know the Truth.

I’d like to hold out hope that the Elevation Partners people will wrench Palm into the present and even the future. But so much time has been wasted! Plus, Palm’s leadership, just like Muslim clerics, tends to believe what it wants to be believe:

Seasonality

To date, we have not seen significant seasonal variations in customer demand for Treo smartphones. This lack of seasonality contrasts with our experience of selling handheld computers due to three factors. First, the smartphone category has been growing rapidly which may mask any potential seasonality. Second, smartphone sales volumes are influenced by carrier adoption and the release and timing of specific carrier versions which could occur at any time during the fiscal year. Third, our smartphones are sold at higher prices than handheld computers and holiday seasonality typically affects demand for lower priced products. As we introduce lower priced smartphones, we may experience similar seasonality as with our handheld computers.

Our handheld computer lines have historically been affected by seasonality, with associated revenues generally sequentially higher in the second quarter of our fiscal year, as distributors and retailers purchase product in anticipation of the December holiday selling season. We also have historically experienced smaller positive effects on revenue in the first and fourth quarters of our fiscal year, as distributors and retailers purchase product in anticipation of the back-to-school and the Father’s Day and graduation selling seasons, respectively. The timing of our new product launches also contributes to fluctuations in our revenue. While we historically introduced new handheld computer products in the fall and in the spring, which historically contributed to higher revenue in the second and fourth fiscal quarters, respectively, this pattern has been less pronounced with the product mix shifting to smartphones.

Unasked is: Are people not giving Treos as gifts because they suck? People won’t give other people something as a gift if they don’t like it themselves.

“The market grew 45% but Palm, with Treo, quarter after quarter it has not increased share,” added Cozza. “Palm is stuck at 3% and its growth is below the market average, whereas competitors like Rim [which makes the BlackBerry] and Nokia are increasing share.”

How will Ed Colligan explain the millions of iPhones bought as gifts later this year? Fluke? Apple Reality Distortion Field? Alien abductions?

edcolliganwsj001.jpg

“We’ve learned and struggled for a few years here figuring out how to make a decent phone. PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They’re not going to just walk in.’”
Ed Colligan

edcolliganwsj002.jpg

“In my opinion, the Foleo is going to be most successful and the most significant product that Palm has done.”
— Ed Colligan

foleodelete02.jpg


The Palm Foleo Disaster: Part Two

September 12, 2007

In Part One I reviewed the disastrous introduction and abysmal marketing of the Foleo. In this part, I think it will be instructive to delve into the history that’s been shared by Hawkins, Dubinsky, and Colligan for three reasons:

1) It’s affected Palm for the worse

2) They previously experienced what happened with the Foleo

3) They should have known better

pilotpalmcover.jpg

On pages 272-273 of Piloting Palm:The Inside Story of Palm, Handspring, and the Birth of the Billion-Dollar Handheld Industry by Andrea Butter and David Pogue, we find this about the beginning days of Handspring:

Yet Colligan and Dubinsky held off on revealing the company’s [Handspring’s] new [and first] product until it was ready; they had no interest in hurting Palm’s sales. Furthermore, “we had this mantra of ‘Underpromise, overdeliver,'” Dubinsky says. “We really didn’t want to come out as our first introduction to the public with vaporware.” When, in June, a Wall Street Journal journalist pressed especially hard for details of the product Handspring was working on, Dubinsky replied, point-blank: “Look . . . this is a market where there’s been lots of hype, where people are announcing things and not delivering. We want to deliver a real product, not hype.”

Emphasis added by me.

Given that Ben Combee, a programmer and insider to the Foleo project, stated that “[w]e weren’t ready to go to market with this,” why then did Palm permit the Foleo’s premature introduction?

It’s been rumored that Palm learned “other companies” were going to announce “similar devices.”

So what?

As far as I can see, the only other product that’s been compared to the Foleo is the Asus Eee PC. It’s no Foleo. And although it’s very competitive at face value on both price and features, no one has had much hands-on time with it. In fact, there’s still wild speculation about its final hardware. Plus, the highly-publicized $199 price has disappeared and the lowest-cost model to be sold in the U.S. is $259. It could very well have a short durability lifespan and be the world’s first disposable computer.

It can’t be that Microsoft has found a sucker new licensee willing to put Windows Mobile in a Foleo-like form factor. That was tried years ago by several prominent manufacturers — Hitachi, NEC, LG, and HP among them — and it failed. It would fail again today. The more-capable viral-marketed UMPCs haven’t yet replaced many notebooks.

Even if Nokia were to go irrevocably insane and come out with a Foleo-like device running Maemo, it’d flop too. No one looks to Nokia for anything other than phones. It has no clout in other market segments and hardly any presence in America.

Intel announced with a huge fanfare its Mobile Internet Device (MID) initiative and displayed several different prototypes. But there hasn’t been a single manufacturer who has committed to building and selling them. No one knows what such a product would be priced at, either.

Currently, the only Linux device that’s been on the market has been the Pepper Pad 3. And judging from the near-invisible owner presence it has on the Net, it can’t be taken seriously as any threat to Palm. (Besides which, it looks like the two stores that were carrying it in New York City — J&R and DataVision — have both stopped.)

(If Nokia and the Pepper Pad 3 have done anything, it’s the degradation of mass-market Linux. Anyone contemplating a Nokia device will find this on the Net. As for the Pepper Pad 3, some reading of owner comments are enough to dissuade potential purchasers.)

It will probably remain a mystery what prompted Palm to pull the trigger on the Foleo. If it was the need to meet the Mossberg conference deadline, Jeff Hawkins could have simply gone to it with the Foleo and framed it as a technology demonstration preview. After that, Palm could have shut up about it and let the Net bubble over in anticipatory speculation about what flavor of Linux it was using, how much storage, etc, etc. Palm could have also solicited features potential customers wanted through polls on its website and blog (their blog would have finally had a useful role!)

The above strategy worked well for Steve Jobs and the iPhone in January!

The next part of the history Hawkins, Dubinsky, and Coligan shared has to do with the first PDA ever created and marketed: the Casio/Tandy Zoomer, which Hawkins helped to create.

zoomer3a.jpg

What they learned from Zoomer owners has carried over to Palm and overshadowed the way it develops devices. On pages 56-57 of Piloting Palm:

Dubinsky had grasped early on that, as a company that wrote software for other companies’ products, it was crucial for Palm to have a good mailing list of those products’ customers [the initial Palm company created software, not hardware]. She had therefore insisted in the contract negotiations not only that she’d have the right to use the list of Zoomer’s registered users, but even that Palm was to receive the Zoomer’s registration cards directly as they were returned by Zoomer buyers. This issue had been a contentious contract term with Casio to the very end.

Now, however, a package of registration cards arrived at Palm each week, revealing a startling fact to the Palm executives: Most Zoomer owners declared that they owned a PC.

When Palm began advertising PalmConnect directly to them, orders for PalmConnect began pouring in. Nearly half of the Zoomer owners bought the PC connection package. [PalmConnect was a program to transfer data between a Zoomer and a desktop computer.]

Jeff Hawkins, and with him the rest of Palm, was learning firsthand a crucial lesson: People didn’t necessarily want to own a second computer. They want an accessory to their PCs, some means of carrying around the data that were also on their hard drives. All the PC functions that Palm and GeoWorks had painstakingly built into the Zoomer did nothing but clutter the screen with options that the customer didn’t need.

Emphasis added by me.

That was the seed of thinking that was to retard the growth of Palm’s devices for many years.

On page 61 of Piloting Palm there is more to the story:

Ed Colligan commissioned in-depth surveys of Zoomer buyers and, with the other Palm executives, pored over the data. The good news: Only 10 percent of customers had returned their Zoomers, a surprisingly low number for an expensive gadget. Nearly 75 percent were satisfied with their purchase, which boded well for a much-improved Zoomer II.

In his original product concept, Jeff had assumed that adding many small applications (e.g., the language translator, games, a dictionary, America Online, etc) would enhance the customer’s enjoyment of the machine. Even as they labored over these features, the engineers had known that nobody would use them all — “but everybody will find three or four things they love,” they had said. However, Ed’s survey showed that, in fact, Zoomer owners almost never touched those other programs. Instead, they used the $700 computer almost exclusively as an organizer: the date book, address book, and memo pad. Buyers couldn’t have cared less about the other nifty features that Palm had painstakingly built.

Another finding: Almost no one printed from the Zoomer. So much for the premise that a handheld should be, at its core, a scaled-down PC.

Emphasis added by me.

These user surveys defined the scope of what would eventually become the first Palm PDA. And afterward it was this framework that would work against Palm as Microsoft continued to hone Pocket PC and begin to chip away at Palm sales.

I contend that this long-obsolete view of the handheld/portable-device market — from a sample of Zoomer owners that simply cannot in any way be deemed scientifically valid — also fed into the design of the Foleo. Hence, no built-in ability to print from a Foleo. No video. And an overall perception of Lack.

Until Hawkins, Dubinsky, and Colligan discard this history, Palm devices will never have the basic and sweeping imagination needed to compete against ones that weren’t developed under such a constraining and antique vision.

Palm could have never developed the iPhone. Because it didn’t fit into what they were taught so long ago. Zoomer owners wound up creating a sort of design religion that’s hardened into a crust of fundamentalism at Palm. It explains why Palm has been so hard of hearing towards its users: we are like infidels and they are like Muslim clerics! Only they know the Truth.

On pages 54-55 of Piloting Palm we encounter a lesson Jeff Hawkins learned but apparently never passed on to Ed Colligan:

Only Jeff Hawkins saw the flaws of the product he’d helped design. A few weeks after CES, at a talk at a swank computer industry conference, he demonstrated the Zoomer onstage. After his presentation, the moderator turned to the audience and asked, “Would you buy a Zoomer for yourself?” Three-quarters of the audience raised their hands.

“I sat there thinking, ‘This is going to be a huge hit!'” Hawkins remembers. “On the other hand, when I personally used the product, I felt it was usuable, but a lot lacking. I learned a lesson from that. You can’t be swayed by public opinion about a product that people haven’t had a chance to use.”

Emphasis added by me.

But when it came to the Foleo, Palm was!

Even worse, Palm has now created a barrier in people’s minds that will be very hard to overcome. Again, it’s something the three have been through before. On page 55 of Piloting Palm:

The Zoomer arrived in stores in early October. Early adopters snapped up 20,000 units during the first two months. Then sales slowed to a trickle. The Palm executives believed that Apple had poisoned the market. In the aftermath of the Newton fiasco, how could anyone — in the press or in the computer store — keep an open mind about the Zoomer?

Let me revise that for today:

The Palm executives believed that the Foleo had poisoned the market. In the aftermath of the Foleo fiasco, how could anyone — in the press or in the computer store — keep an open mind about the Foleo 2?

Ed Colligan stated he was canceling the Foleo. He chose the wrong word. He should have used postponing. It’s the difference between saying something will never come back and saying something still needs work. What’s the tagline Palm will use if they do produce a Foleo 2?

Back From the Grave and Better than Before!

You Thought It Was Dead. Not Yet!

We Never Killed It. We Just Hurt It A Little Bit.

Don’t Worry! It’s Been Fixed!

The general public, which is not known for careful reading or listening, got the message that Palm introduced something that turned out to be so bad they had to pull it back before it ever reached store shelves. All the news headlines they glimpsed — a form of viral marketing in itself! — said CANCEL, not delay or postpone. Beyond that message, people don’t care.

When Foleo 2 arrives in stores, people will wonder why they have a visceral reaction of dread towards it. No one likes to think they’re buying a lemon. Or a zombie. (“Maybe they brought it back just to try to get some money out of their losses?.” “If they killed it once, maybe they’ll kill it again?” “If they didn’t think people would buy it the first time, will anyone buy it now?”)

What makes it all even worse: Palm has given Apple a glimpse of how future computing could be.

Apple has succeeded in creating a version of OS X for portable devices. It’s in the iPhone and iPod Touch (probably in all recent iPods too). To think that version of OS X will stop there is foolish.

I can easily see Apple developing a Foleo-like device that would trump Palm’s creation. Apple has its own sync program: iSync.

isync.jpg

Apple could expand it into a sync-anything program that would transfer many kinds of files between an iPhone, a desktop Mac, and a Foleo-like Flash RAM-based “satellite Mac.”

Where the Foleo concentrates on email sync, a “satellite Mac” would not be so choosy. Apple’s iSync could be a sync slut, permitting anything — text, spreadsheet, photo, audio, maybe even short video — to move seamlessly between Bluetooth and WiFi-capable Apple devices.

Plus, just as it did with the Safari browser, Apple could develop and release — for free! — a PC version of iSync.

Also, unlike Palm, Apple owns a suite of productivity programs: iWork. That code can morph into a ready-made light productivity suite for a “Mac Foleo.”

iwork.jpg

And if Apple were to develop such a “Mac Foleo,” you can bet Steve Jobs won’t stumble in selling everyone on his vision for mobile computing. If he were to give a technology demonstration of such a device — an iBook 2? — at January MacWorld Expo and then, iPhone-like, tell people it wouldn’t arrive for another six months, he’d freeze the market for portable computing and, without spending a single marketing cent, exterminate Palm’s Foleo 2.

Palm’s squandering of its market lead and its alienation of power users through the years could come to this. The full magnitude of the Foleo disaster has yet to be discerned.

Let me close this part of the series with the words of Ed Colligan, from page 54 of Piloting Palm:

Palm watched the unfolding Newton drama intently. Apple’s mistake was right out of the marketing textbook. As Colligan summed it up to his colleagues, “They over-promised and under-delivered.”

foleo-top.jpg
Over-promised and under-delivered. Thanks, Ed! Love from Steve Jobs.

In Part Three, I will examine the Foleo specs in light of the real world (that is, outside Palm’s Zoomer-created dogma) and reveal a better marketer of the Foleo than Palm.

In the final part of this series, Part Four, I will outline how the Foleo could have been saved before Ed Colligan hit the Cancel button on it and the possibilities for bringing it back from its premature grave.

Click here for Part One of this series.

=======================
Did you just read this post? Now click here.

Previously in this blog:
Quote Of The Day: Flashback To iPod Introduction
Blog Notes: Brain Fever
You Still Make Me Want To Bleed To Death
Foleo: The Beat Goes On…
Asus Eee: Increasing RAM Possible
The Palm Foleo Disaster: Part One
What Was Your ROS*, Palm?
Blog Notes: Yes, I’m Working On It!
Dumbass Of The Year: Ed Colligan
I’m So Bad, I’m Good
If We Can’t Have Momentum On This, Can I At Least Get An Amen, Brother?
Newsflash! Pictures Of Corpses Left In Wake Of iPhone Price Cut!
Palm Kills Foleo
OK, Now The Foleo Scares Me
Ugh. Backlogged. Still.
Poor Ed Colligan. Ascared Of Me.
Engadget Snags The Attention Of Autistic Palm, Inc.
iPhonespotting
Oh Look! I Get To Bash Palm And Nokia At The Same Time! It’s Two Two Two Hits In One!
Palm Flogs Blog, Flails, Fails
iPhone Vs. Palm Treo: You Can’t Fight A Corpse
Microsoft, Palm, And Nokia: You Better Be Freaking Out!!
Failure Has A New Name
Treo-Skimming. A Post-iPhone Craze?
Record Blog Traffic: Apple iPhone Vs. Palm Foleo
Earth To Palm: Change The Foleo’s Browser To Safari
What Foleo 2.0 Needs
If FSJ Says It, Then It Is So!
Oh My God! What Did We Buy?!!?
Prediction: Palm To Drop All Handhelds
LifeDrive Notes: Should Palm’s Software Engineers Be Beaten With A Spiked Bat Or Tied Up Together And Dumped In The Ocean From 30,000 Feet?
Palm’s Flopeo, Uh, Foleo: Best Other Name For It
A Picture Of Two Tech Devices That Should Have Never Been Released
My Reaction To Palm’s New Foleo Device
On A Day When Palm Gets Everything Wrong, Apple Gets It Right


The Palm Foleo Disaster: Part One

September 10, 2007

There is now a Part Two.

[Update: Correction made to Docs2Go functionality.]

The Foleo had been in development for quite some time. The first inkling of it being in development came from Palm founder and PDA market creator Jeff Hawkins, who explicitly stated that Palm had a “third business.”

Hawkins: Palm Has Secret Third Business
Friday, August 05, 2005 12:19:36 PM

Here is the key quote:

What are the implications of a world where everyone has a super high-speed Internet connection in their pocket and many gigabytes of storage, super-fast processors, audio, visual and multimedia? What are the consequences of that? How will that change computing when you have all that stuff available to you all the time?

Close to two years later, with that quote being repeatedly and constantly referred to by people and passed around like some sacred talisman or a token of hope to be redeemed in the future, Jeff Hawkins himself revealed that the Third Business was the Foleo.

Foleo specs:

Processor:
416MHz Intel PXA27x

RAM:
256MB of non-volatile memory
about 128MB available for data and applications

Graphics Processor:
Marathon 2700G graphics accelerator

Storage:
Compact Flash (CF) maxing out at 2GB;
Secure Digital (SD) maxing out at 2GB;
Support for FAT16 and FAT32 formatted USB Flash drives

Networking:
802.11b Wi-Fi
Bluetooth v1.2

NO Flash video capability, NO MP3 player included, NO video player included

Web browsing was ONE window. Documents to Go was ONE file open at a time. [Update: see end of post for correction]

NO core Palm apps included: No Calendar, No Contacts, No Tasks, No Memos.

NO HotSyncing with a desktop.

Is it any wonder people were up in arms after being primed with:

What are the implications of a world where everyone has a super high-speed Internet connection in their pocket and many gigabytes of storage, super-fast processors, audio, visual and multimedia? What are the consequences of that? How will that change computing when you have all that stuff available to you all the time?

It wasn’t pocketable, it didn’t have gigabytes of storage, it didn’t have a super-fast processor, and it couldn’t do any multimedia!

I was one of the earliest to slam it on Palm Infocenter, the first to rechristen it:

RE: Third business.
mikecane @ 5/30/2007 2:41:52 PM #

>>>UMPCs will blow this thing away, or the market for it simply doesn’t exist.

2008 will bring:
http://tinyurl.com/2mq6fl

Intel prototype 01

Intel prototype 02

Foleo. Flopio is more like it!

Hey, you Nokia N800 users. This gonna make you switch? Thought not!

Why would I want to shell out $500-$600 bucks for something that looks like it was ripped off from HPs old sub-subnotebook (I can’t recall the model now; someone will dig it up somewhere) and has far less capability than a notebook that costs maybe 1.5-2x as much and can do, minimally, A HUNDRED TIMES MORE?

Next!

And I slammed it on this blog too:

My Reaction To Palm’s New Foleo Device

Millennium 03

Lost in this mob action were comments such as this one (which no one even bothered to reply to):

excellent product by Palm
chiefthetony @ 5/30/2007 2:33:52 PM #

If anyone has trid to do some work using the small screen and the small keyboard will appreciate this one.

Nope. Jeff Kirvin, who has for years advocated PDAs for writing, had this reaction to the Foleo: Foleo – Are you freaking kidding me?

All the hassle of a laptop, none of the utility

I already stopped carrying my Stowaway Sierra Bluetooth keyboard because it was too much of a hassle for the limited stuff I can do with mobile apps. The Foleo is at least twice the size of my Stowaway, and far more power hungry, yet it doesn’t offer much more. You get a bigger screen, sure, but you’re still limited on what you can do with it.

Also, in Comments at his blog:

This could be a new platform, it could be the first really viable Linux consumer PC, it could be a rethinking of what a laptop should be in the Web 2.0 era, but… it’s just not very good. Nice idea, Hawkins, pretty laughable execution.

The reaction I — and most people — had was entirely justified given what Hawkins himself had said. Speculation had been all over the map. None of us could see what Hawkins was possibly working on, what he had found that no one else could. And with PalmOS becoming more arthritic by the day, with Palm itself making misstep after misstep, with Palm hardware gaining a reputation for outright shoddiness, few people were prepared to stop and listen to an announcement that was less than Capital-S Spectacular.

It just so happens that such an announcement came in January — but it was from Apple, not Palm. Apple had concretized the latent dreams of many and also gone beyond what anyone could imagine.

It was what we had all expected from Jeff Hawkins and Palm.

So when Hawkins was shown on stage with Mossberg and in subsequent videos saying, “The Foleo syncs email with a Treo” — and that was its key selling point and central functionality! — we who had waited for much too long and been treated like less than dirt for several years by Palm weren’t about to pause and think. Our collective disappointment and the contrast with the iPhone was too much to bear. We wanted blood.

But: Jeff Hawkins and Palm brought all of it on themselves.

It also didn’t help that Hawkins had no defense against Mossberg’s question about the Foleo being able to access YouTube videos. It’s as if Hawkins figured we’d all be wowed by email sync and forget about — well, forget about the rest of the world! When he said if he were to design it today it would have a faster processor, what was everyone else left to think, seeing the Foleo’s own father being ashamed of it?

What could have possibly been in Hawkins’ head? What did he imagine the reaction would be to the Foleo? Apparently not what he expected — because after Mossberg, his position was all defensive. Instead of making any effort to save the Foleo, he stood his ground, back to the wall, looking like a self-deluded fool.

I’ve been in the corporate world. I’ve attended presentation rehearsals. Did Hawkins ever do any? Did anyone outside his own bubble ever present tough questions to him so he — and a team of PR professionals — could develop cogent and convincing responses that would bend the audience to his will? If he did, then he was ill-served by those PR pros and they should be fired for massive failure. And what about Palm? Did Palm ever bother to formulate a Plan B if Plan A went into the toilet? And as they watched it going down the toilet, did they even consider a Plan B?

Steve Jobs is accused of having a Reality-Distortion Field. That is, of course, an exaggeration. What Steve Jobs is able to do is sell his vision.

The iPhone is, at the time of this writing, a closed platform. Yet Steve Jobs spun crappy web services into something that sounded like a good thing. And he did it in a way that has everyone — especially me! — waiting for the implied promise of an iPhone SDK that will turn the iPhone into exactly what it looks like: a pocketable Mac. He made it sound as if by allowing the iPhone to use web services, we would be sticking it to the Suits of AT&T who wanted to protect their precious network, stifle innovation, and gouge iPhone owners any possible way they could. It was brilliant positioning (even if most people didn’t buy it, they admired his chutzpah!).

Hawkins was unprepared to spin. The best he could come up with was Instant On. And the way he presented it was in a desperate, “Well, if you don’t like the Big Thing, do you think maybe you’ll kind of like this little thing?” He seemed like he was begging.

A man who was able to create the first usable PDA and create a global market where none had existed before should have never been put in such an embarrassing position. It was disgraceful. It was suicidal.

And what was even worse than that?

Ed Colligan coming along to disgrace himself and to publicly humiliate Hawkins.

Palm, in its great talent for self-delusion, created what it believes to be a blog. When the blog began, and for some time afterward, there wasn’t a peep from Colligan on it. You would think that on something that is supposed to represent an open exchange between a company and its customers — a glastnost and perestroika — it would begin with a message from the CEO of that company, to thank the customers, to share his vision for the blog, to explain how he will participate.

There was none of that.

Yet in the middle of the Foleo wildfire, Ed Colligan breaks precedent and rides in with a public statement thanking a tech-toy fan website for its free consulting!

What?

After years and years and years of thousands and thousands of Palm customers voicing their ideas and their complaints, Ed Colligan basically says, I’m Only Gonna Listen To Engadget!

And the way he did it was so egregiously awful, the worst parts bear repeating with analysis:

I really appreciate the fact that you guys and others care enough to take the time to write such a comprehensive list of actions.

Aw, let me give you a nice hug! What’s scary to begin with is that Colligan seems to believe that pseudo-list addressed everything! I can see Colligan reading and going, “Phew! That’s all that’s wrong with us? Then we’re in pretty good shape overall!”

Of course it only gets worse:

I forwarded it to our entire executive staff and many others at Palm have read it.

What? It sounds like Ed printed it out, scurried to a Xerox machine, made a bunch of copies, and ran through the corridors of Palm from office to office shouting, “Ya gotta read this ! Ya gotta read this!” It made it seemed as if the entire staff at Palm are a bunch of eejits who can’t figure it out for themselves, who never go into stores to see competitor products, and it made Ed Colligan himself look like a stark imbecile taking orders from little boys.

I mean, had that techie site stated anything new? When had any of it never been said? What part of it was brand new?

And if any part of it was brand new to Ed Colligan and Palm, then that company is finished because it’s clearly running on arrogance.

It gets even worse:

Let’s remember that it is very early in the evolution of the smartphone and there is enormous opportunity for us to innovate. We have only just begun to fight!

JK on the Run dispatched that bit of nonsense succinctly:

Engadget appeals to Palm- they respond

The folks at engadget outlined a course of action for Palm to get the slumbering PDA maker back into the competitive fast lane. It is a good plan and apparently Palm is watching. Ed Colligan has promised on the Palm blog that some exciting stuff is coming up. To quote Ed:

Let’s remember that it is very early in the evolution of the smartphone and there is enormous opportunity for us to innovate. We have only just begun to fight!

That statement sums up Palm’s problem in a single sentence. You see, Mr. Colligan, the rest of the industry began to fight at least seven years ago. You’d better train awfully hard for this fight.

One key issue in Engadget’s list was this bit, which I think made everyone go WTF?

Stop wasting money on the Foleo – We all know this isn’t going anywhere. And even if it does do alright — and let’s be real, it’s never going to do better than alright — it’s really just a distraction from the main business you’re already neglecting. Besides, how many Treo companions do you expect to sell if the Treo itself isn’t up to snuff? The Foleo is not the way to make the core product better.

Wait a minute. Where did this come from? Its inclusion, after droning and twee paragraphs that go on and on about Treos, is just bizarre. Why this? If the focus is Treo, I would have expected a denunciation of the PDA line, a line which both Palm and Hawkins have explicitly stated is “mature” and “declining” and seem to have no enthusiasm for.

To me, it seems as if everything else that’s been written is nothing but camouflage for that bombshell. Everything else was casing for that explosive.

Why suddenly torpedo something new? Especially after word after word extolling the authors’ alleged expertise — which apparently doesn’t include how very limited the original Pilots were and the evolution of their increased functionality. I would expect them, experts they claim to be, to see the Foleo as akin to the original Pilot and understand how it would evolve. But no. Let’s look at some of this a bit closer. First off:

We all know this isn’t going anywhere.

We do? Who is this “we?” There are many people on the Internet — aside from the Linux fringe — who are earnest in their desire to buy the Foleo. Potential customers — the market for products — suddenly don’t matter? Jeff Hawkins was pleased by the personal reactions he received to the Foleo from executives at the D Conference!

It gets uglier:

And even if it does do alright — and let’s be real, it’s never going to do better than alright

In other words, we could be wrong, but Ed, that’s not what you really want to hear. And “it’s never going to do better than alright” — never? Never? Who are these guys? Why aren’t they placing horse bets to get rich? They seem to have a pipeline into the future! You mean to tell me that people who buy the Foleo won’t start proselytizing it? That they won’t show it to family, friends, coworkers, even total strangers? That people seeing it being used won’t ever ask about it? No blogs will spring up around it? Firsthand reports of real-world usage won’t fly around the Internet? It might sell, in other words, but then die because its happy owners will all keep it a secret? What is this crap?

Given Ed Colligan’s unprecedented response, it reads in retrospect as if they are giving him permission to cave in to the firestorm of criticism.

Let me bang the hammer on this so everyone gets the proper perspective on this.

Hawkins, Dubinsky, and Colligan once upon a time left Palm to create Handspring. Handspring was going to enter the PDA market against two huge companies: 3Com/Palm and Sony. It was also going to go up against Microsoft. At the time, no one ridiculed the idea of starting a company from scratch and competing in the PDA marketplace. And, in fact, when the Handspring Visor was released, it contained a glaring technical strike against it: it didn’t have the OS in a Flash ROM. The OS could never be upgraded (and that was a real never, unlike the fantasyland Engadget version of that word). In addition, the Handspring Springboard slot needed to garner support to help sell Visors. Investing in, designing, and tooling up to deliver hardware is much more expensive than software. Ultimately, trying to nurture a Springboard ecology failed. And yet there weren’t one-tenth the objections to the entire Handspring venture than there have been for the Foleo. The Foleo, which could be expanded in functionality via software and which already had several developers announcing products for both the consumer and corporate markets.

Now look at the timing of this.

Engadget lets loose on Tuesday, August 21. Colligan replies on Thursday, August 23. The day before, Wednesday, August 22, an analyst claimed the Foleo was going to miss its summer sales deadline. On Friday, August 24, Palm issued a denial. Note that: Palm issued a denial.

In chronological list order:

Tuesday: Engadget open letter to Palm
Wednesday: Foleo rumored late
Thursday: Colligan’s reply to Engadget
Friday: Palm denies Foleo rumor

Why not just shut up about the lateness rumor? Apple does it all the time. It works for them. (When Dvorak let loose with rumors about the iPhone’s alleged abysmal battery life and possible late arrival, there was no denial from Apple.) Why bother to issue a denial? And who authorized said communication?

That was the last of the Foleo news. From anybody. No new software was announced. No new pronouncements about the Foleo appeared on the Palm blog. No shipping date was announced.

The debate even paused on the Internet.

On Monday, September 3, after several days of contemplating what I need as tech tools, I write a blog item that hints my objections are beginning to weaken. In fact, all of my objections nearly collapsed earlier in the week, and I had begun a post that I never published. What motivated that post is something I’ll discuss in a later part.

On Tuesday, September 4, right after the long Labor Day weekend (which I doubt was a holiday for any of the Palm top-tier executives), Ed Colligan does two things that are unprecedented:

1) His writing appears on the Palm blog for a second time

2) He publicly announces the cancellation of the Foleo

Jeff Hawkins, father of the first successful PDA, who enthused about his latest world-changing product, was publicly humiliated by the company he had founded.

Did anyone notice that Jeff Hawkins didn’t issue any statement?

What is particularly eerie in Colligan’s announcement is his wording, calling the Foleo:

a platform that is not central to our core focus.

Contrast that with what Engadget said:

The Foleo is not the way to make the core product better.

Now Corporate Man tends to use a limited vocabulary (which consists of using “implementation” a lot), but it is very odd that fans would indulge in using the term “core” when “central” or “predominant” or “foremost” or even the name Treo would do. Who is mimicking whom? Why does it seem as if both are part of one script? Why do I get the impression not of a dialogue, but of two partners engaged in a rehearsed dance?

There’s also a question no one has bothered to ask:

Ed Colligan leads a company that has a valuation of over one billion dollars. Do his actions seem worthy of that position?

Two sites have called for the removal of Ed Colligan. Ordinarily, this would mean nothing. But in light of the fact a man entrusted with leading a billion-dollar-plus global corporation seemingly takes advice from websites, it has new weight. (Hey, Ed, I asked for you to leave too! That makes three sites!) Perhaps the Palm Board of Directors or stockholders will follow Ed’s sudden penchant for website advice?

(Do I think Colligan would voluntarily leave or that Donna Dubinsky or Hawkins would support his leaving? No. You have to understand the double mean of “Treo.” It’s not just a brand name. It also signifies the Hawkins-Dubinsky-Colligan trio.)

In Part Two I will further elaborate on the Foleo as announced, how it ties in with the history of the Hawkins-Dubinsky-Colligan troika, the monkey-wrench thrown into the Foleo works, and how the Foleo could have been saved even with its limitations and despite the Internet Category 5-strength objections.

foleo-top.jpg
Take a good long look. It will probably never be back.

Update: According to this post on TreoCentral, multiple documents could be open in Docs2Go:

I’d just like to point out that you were able to have an unlimited number of documents open in Word To Go, Slideshow To Go, and Sheet To Go. There was a dropdown box at the top of the screen that allowed you to switch from one document to the next, and you could also use keyboard shortcuts to do so. You did not have to save the document; it was left in a suspended state so when you switch back to it, you’re right back where you left off.

edit: One other thing I forgot is that we implemented an “autosave” mechanism so that when you switched out of a document, or into another application, your changes would be saved to your document even if you did not explicitly perform a save. That way, your documents would always be up to date. Of course, you could still revert your changes if it turns out you really didn’t want the file saved after all.

I agree that having the switching done via tabs instead of the dropdown box would have been cool, but the basic functionality was already in place.

That I only found out about that today — the day after posting this entry — just emphasizes what a disaster marketing the Foleo was. That was never widely known.

Click for Part Two.

Previously in this blog:
What Was Your ROS*, Palm?
Blog Notes: Yes, I’m Working On It!
Dumbass Of The Year: Ed Colligan
I’m So Bad, I’m Good
If We Can’t Have Momentum On This, Can I At Least Get An Amen, Brother?
Newsflash! Pictures Of Corpses Left In Wake Of iPhone Price Cut!
Palm Kills Foleo
OK, Now The Foleo Scares Me
Ugh. Backlogged. Still.
Poor Ed Colligan. Ascared Of Me.
Engadget Snags The Attention Of Autistic Palm, Inc.
iPhonespotting
Oh Look! I Get To Bash Palm And Nokia At The Same Time! It’s Two Two Two Hits In One!
Palm Flogs Blog, Flails, Fails
iPhone Vs. Palm Treo: You Can’t Fight A Corpse
Microsoft, Palm, And Nokia: You Better Be Freaking Out!!
Failure Has A New Name
Treo-Skimming. A Post-iPhone Craze?
Record Blog Traffic: Apple iPhone Vs. Palm Foleo
Earth To Palm: Change The Foleo’s Browser To Safari
What Foleo 2.0 Needs
If FSJ Says It, Then It Is So!
Oh My God! What Did We Buy?!!?
Prediction: Palm To Drop All Handhelds
LifeDrive Notes: Should Palm’s Software Engineers Be Beaten With A Spiked Bat Or Tied Up Together And Dumped In The Ocean From 30,000 Feet?
Palm’s Flopeo, Uh, Foleo: Best Other Name For It
A Picture Of Two Tech Devices That Should Have Never Been Released
My Reaction To Palm’s New Foleo Device
On A Day When Palm Gets Everything Wrong, Apple Gets It Right


Dumbass Of The Year: Ed Colligan

September 7, 2007

gatescolligan.jpg
Wow. Look at me with Bill Gates!!!

colligantreos.jpg
We are so good!

Colligan Laughs Off iPhone Competition

“We’ve learned and struggled for a few years here figuring out how to make a decent phone. PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They’re not going to just walk in.'”

jobsiphone.jpg

OOPS!

Previously in this blog:
I’m So Bad, I’m Good
If We Can’t Have Momentum On This, Can I At Least Get An Amen, Brother?
Newsflash! Pictures Of Corpses Left In Wake Of iPhone Price Cut!
Palm Kills Foleo
OK, Now The Foleo Scares Me
Ugh. Backlogged. Still.
Poor Ed Colligan. Ascared Of Me.
Engadget Snags The Attention Of Autistic Palm, Inc.
iPhonespotting
Oh Look! I Get To Bash Palm And Nokia At The Same Time! It’s Two Two Two Hits In One!
Palm Flogs Blog, Flails, Fails
iPhone Vs. Palm Treo: You Can’t Fight A Corpse
Microsoft, Palm, And Nokia: You Better Be Freaking Out!!
Failure Has A New Name
Treo-Skimming. A Post-iPhone Craze?
Record Blog Traffic: Apple iPhone Vs. Palm Foleo
Earth To Palm: Change The Foleo’s Browser To Safari
What Foleo 2.0 Needs
If FSJ Says It, Then It Is So!
Oh My God! What Did We Buy?!!?
Prediction: Palm To Drop All Handhelds
LifeDrive Notes: Should Palm’s Software Engineers Be Beaten With A Spiked Bat Or Tied Up Together And Dumped In The Ocean From 30,000 Feet?
Palm’s Flopeo, Uh, Foleo: Best Other Name For It
A Picture Of Two Tech Devices That Should Have Never Been Released
My Reaction To Palm’s New Foleo Device
On A Day When Palm Gets Everything Wrong, Apple Gets It Right


A Third Post-iTunes Fable For NBC: Steve Jobs Is Journeyman

September 7, 2007

chuck01.jpg
Chuck comes through with a leak of Journeyman!

journeymandvd-01.jpg
Some clever NBC promotion embedded within it. Today Show when Zucker reigned.

journeymandvd-02.jpg
They went Lost-like with the titles. Brief bit of music & series title.

journeymandvd-03.jpg
I have to give credit to a brother writer.

journeymandvd-04.jpg
Yeah, the director too. (Support the WGA, DGA!)

journeymandvd-05.jpg
The Jman presents some m4Dd skI77z too!

But these next photos explain why NBC cannot beat Steve Jobs. And also how the iPhone came to be.

journeymandvd-06.jpg

journeymandvd-07.jpg

journeymandvd-08.jpg

journeymandvd-09.jpg

journeymandvd-10.jpg

journeymandvd-11.jpg

Do you see NBC? You cannot beat Steve Jobs. He’s a Journeyman too. The iPhone is obviously technology he stole while visiting the future. He’s already seen your abysmal and tragic failure with Amazon’s Unbox. He’s already seen Zucker having to resign in disgrace! He’s already seen a near-dead NBC being unloaded by GE to Rupert Murdoch!

journeymandvd-12.jpg

See it! See it!

journeymandvd-13.jpg

And the iPhone was created by Apple — in 2020!

jeff-zucker.jpg
Already defeated!

Disclaimer: Publication of these screensnaps is in no way an admission, implicit or explicit, of an illegal act having taken place. In cyberspace, even streamed video can be screensnapped, with no data ever residing in the local computer. Ask your attorneys, Suits. Or even better, ask your Local Chuck — hell, you’re putting on a whole TV series about them!

Previously in this blog: (Post-iTunes/Journeyman)
A Second Post-iTunes Fable For NBC: You Got Chucked!
A Post-iTunes Fable For NBC
Should Apple Turn iTunes Into A Platform?
NBC: Stop Being Blonde!
NBC To Give Away Show Pilots
Journeyman: Still Unleaked!
Fall Network TV Doom Watch List
Journeyman: All Available Vids
Journeyman: No Leak, But Two YouTube Vids
NBC: Leak Journeyman NOW! Early Reports NOT Good!
YouTube: NBC Fall Preview
ABC Kicks NBC’s Ass For Fall TV Buzz
Hey, NBC! Leak Journeyman NOW!
Now NBC Has Pissed Me Off!
Journeyman: Interesting Bits
Hey You Three. Email NBC!
Journeyman Still Not Leaked
September 2005: NBC Promotes A New Earl Show
I Give NBC A Kick To The Nuts. It’s Called An Incentive.
Now Sinfest Persecutes Me!
Hey, NBC! Leak Journeyman, Dammit!!
Bourne Ultimatum? Yes. Journeyman? No.
Hollywood: Settle!
Brightcove: Journeyman Preview
DailyMotion: Ha. Ha. Ha.
Are The Suits Using P2P To Hype Their Shows?

Previously in this blog: (Zucker)
I Wish I Thought Of That!
By The Book: Jeff Zucker Vs. Steve Jobs
Jeff Zucker: Like Dubya, Only Worse
Newsflash! Jeff Zucker Buys Condo From Dick Morris!
Jeff Zucker: He Don’t Do Emo
Jff Zukr: Ur No Gneeiz No
Quote Of The Day: Jobs Rulz, Gates Luz
A Post-iTunes Fable For NBC
Should Apple Turn iTunes Into A Platform?


The DUH! File: BoingBoing Catches Up

September 7, 2007

Confirmation: No Bluetooth in iPod Touch

Did they not pay attention to the intro?

I said it right after:

Uh, everyone out there did notice that the new iPod Touch models lack Bluetooth, right? So if you want something that is capable of keyboard work in the future, the iPhone is the only thing to buy. Let’s not forget too: the iPhone has a built-in camera. Future Mobile Blogging Machine!

Next!

Previously in this blog:
S.O.S. Steve Jobs! eBooks Will Save You!
Newsflash! Pictures Of Corpses Left In Wake Of iPhone Price Cut!
Tomorrow’s iPod: The Beginning Of Bliss?
A Post-iTunes Fable For NBC
Nokia’s Upcoming Fake iPhone
Should Apple Turn iTunes Into A Platform?
iPod Price History: Will Apple Fight Or Lose?
Quote Of The Day: Nokia’s Innate Ineptness
iPod Touch Coming Next Week?
SanDisk Announces The Sansa Clip
jWin MP3 Player Needs Replacement
Another Argument For eBooks On The iPhone
Apple Wins The Internet Video Wars
Reference: Installing Native Apps On An iPhone
iPhone: AT&T Bill Delivered In A BOX!
iPhonespotting
eBooks On iPhone: HarperCollins Kicks In
China’s Ferocious iPhone Clones
Safari For Windows: Still Sick!
iPhone More Popular Than Zune And Harry Potter
eBooks On iPhone: Well, There Are Magazines At Least!
The eBooks On iPhone Campaign: Steve Jobs Loves Books! Hey, Steve, So Do We!!
eBooks On iPhone: The Clamor Continues!
eBookery For iPhone?
eBooks on iPhone: Another Person Who Won’t Wait For Apple
eBooks On iPhone: Not Waiting For Apple!
iPhone: First eBook On It?
iPhone Death Star Upgrade Coming
Mucho Namaste To FSJ!
Will Apple Steal The eBook Limelight From Sony And Create Another Mass Market?


S.O.S. Steve Jobs! eBooks Will Save You!

September 7, 2007

I learn from JK on the Run that Amazon is going to be releasing its horrible ebook reading machine — still with its horrible name: The Kindle — soon.

I further learn from the NY Times article JKotR links to that Google is getting into ebooks too!

Hmmm… isn’t Google about to introduce a cellphone too?

Would it be too insane to think Google’s ebooks will be accessible from Google’s phone? I don’t think so.

Earlier this week, Apple liberated the iPhone-less masses by melting the price down by $200, stirring an outcry from all those who went to buy one very early just so they could Be Cool. Instead of shutting up and paying their deserved Ego Tax, they waaa-waaahed to Apple. (They should be grateful he didn’t instantly obsolete their iPhones by introducing a new model! Something Sony constantly did with their CLIE line of Palm OS PDAs.)

Steve Jobs gave them a $100 apple Store credit (real world value = $30).

Now if Jobs had introduced eBooks into the iTunes Store this week, he could have placated the Early Cool Crowd and single-handedly brought into existence a mass market for ebooks by giving all those crybabies a $100 credit for ebooks at the iTunes Store.

Instantly, millions of ebooks in the Apple iRead format would be in circulation. It would have dwarfed all prior attempts to launch ebooks. Singlehandedly, Apple would have made history and changed an industry once again.

Big lost opportunity. For Apple and for all of us wanting ebooks.

Previously in this blog:
Today’s Episode Of The Steve Jobs Show, Plus More
Newsflash! Pictures Of Corpses Left In Wake Of iPhone Price Cut!
Tomorrow’s iPod: The Beginning Of Bliss?
A Post-iTunes Fable For NBC
Should Apple Turn iTunes Into A Platform?
iPod Touch Coming Next Week?
Another Argument For eBooks On The iPhone
eBooks On iPhone: HarperCollins Kicks In
iPhone More Popular Than Zune And Harry Potter
eBooks On iPhone: Well, There Are Magazines At Least!
The eBooks On iPhone Campaign: Steve Jobs Loves Books! Hey, Steve, So Do We!!
eBooks On iPhone: The Clamor Continues!
eBookery For iPhone?
eBooks on iPhone: Another Person Who Won’t Wait For Apple
eBooks On iPhone: Not Waiting For Apple!
iPhone: First eBook On It?
iPhone Death Star Upgrade Coming
Mucho Namaste To FSJ!
Will Apple Steal The eBook Limelight From Sony And Create Another Mass Market?


Today’s Episode Of The Steve Jobs Show, Plus More

September 5, 2007

Well, he went thermonuclear today. With that $200 price drop on the iPhone, he clear-cut the jungle of phones and made himself a new home. See previous post.

I was hoping for an iPhone/iPod SDK announcement, but I guess this will come with the big Leopard intro next month. I sincerely hope that such an SDK announcement will happen — and along with it, the ability to pair a Bluetooth iPhone with a Bluetooth keyboard (again: mine!). Well, such an ability would probably have to happen via that rumored Death Star Upgrade of the iPhone’s guts. Again, something I hope will be announced next month.

Uh, everyone out there did notice that the new iPod Touch models lack Bluetooth, right? So if you want something that is capable of keyboard work in the future, the iPhone is the only thing to buy. Let’s not forget too: the iPhone has a built-in camera. Future Mobile Blogging Machine!

While I have your attention, I want to dispel two myths about the iPhone from witnessing an everyday person using it last week.

This was a woman who wasn’t any sort of techie. She had an iPhone at last week’s South Street Seaport free concert. I was standing on this pillar and she was sitting in front of me. Basically, I was able to get a good view of her using it, peering over her shoulder.

First, I could not make out what she was typing even though as they’re hit, the on-screen keyboard enlarges each letter. So much for privacy concerns. I think someone would really have to be right next to you in order to effectively spy.

Second, she was fast on that on-screen keyboard — and she was doing it all while holding it in her right hand, bopping on those virtual keys using her thumb! She was doing SMS with it. And she was doing it with more than one person. She would keep popping out of one balloon-filled SMS session to Contacts to open another person’s session and type something in. I was impressed. She made an occasional typo, but she didn’t seem at all frustrated by it. Interestingly, I never saw her choose any of the suggested words from automatic word completion. She was merrily moving that thumb along quickly. So much for all the objections about the lack of a Treo-like hard keyboard!

I fondled an iPhone again last night, before typing this post. I was very interested to see how the iPhone would handle this blog now that I’ve gone from 320-wide photos to 440-wide. I was also interested to see how it would handle the pages here that have a ton of pictures on them.

Well, Safari crashed several times. Just went Poof! Back to that Home screen with no warning.

Now, the Nokia 770 did that a lot on me. The main difference is, with the 770, one of two things would happen: the unit would totally freeze, requiring me to hard reset it, or it would spontaneously hard reset on its own. Restarting the 770 took well over a minute. You cannot imagine the frustration and aggravation of that unless you’ve been through it the several hundred times I’ve been through it.

So what happened with the iPhone and Safari crashing?

I’d immediately get that Home screen. I’d hit the Safari button — and within two seconds Safari would be up reloading the very page it had crashed on. Did I feel the same frustration and anger I felt with the 770? Not at all! In fact, once the page it had crashed on was reloaded, it didn’t crash on that same page again. The 770 usually did!

Another thing: the iPhone has a 320×480 screen. So does my LifeDrive. But absolutely nothing on my LifeDrive looks as sharp and crisp and as vibrant as on that iPhone screen. (As for WiFi on the LifeDrive, forget that! I tried it again last night and it crashed and rebooted on a WAP-formatted page! How pathetic is that?! Also, the LifeDrive takes about three minutes to reboot. Worse than that 770.)

Anyway, it’s clear today that Apple and Steve Jobs intend to keep their foothold on top of the media and smartphone mountain. I don’t see how any company can compete with them. All the rest had years and years and years — and churned out the same crap year after year. Even if they stole outright from Apple, violated all their patents, they would still miss a key ingredient: The iTunes Store.

Now, Steve Jobs, I hope you’re working on adding ebooks!

Previously in this blog:
Newsflash! Pictures Of Corpses Left In Wake Of iPhone Price Cut!
Tomorrow’s iPod: The Beginning Of Bliss?
A Post-iTunes Fable For NBC
Nokia’s Upcoming Fake iPhone
Should Apple Turn iTunes Into A Platform?
iPod Price History: Will Apple Fight Or Lose?
Quote Of The Day: Nokia’s Innate Ineptness
iPod Touch Coming Next Week?
SanDisk Announces The Sansa Clip
jWin MP3 Player Needs Replacement
Another Argument For eBooks On The iPhone
Apple Wins The Internet Video Wars
Reference: Installing Native Apps On An iPhone
iPhone: AT&T Bill Delivered In A BOX!
iPhonespotting
eBooks On iPhone: HarperCollins Kicks In
China’s Ferocious iPhone Clones
Safari For Windows: Still Sick!
iPhone More Popular Than Zune And Harry Potter
eBooks On iPhone: Well, There Are Magazines At Least!
The eBooks On iPhone Campaign: Steve Jobs Loves Books! Hey, Steve, So Do We!!
eBooks On iPhone: The Clamor Continues!
eBookery For iPhone?
eBooks on iPhone: Another Person Who Won’t Wait For Apple
eBooks On iPhone: Not Waiting For Apple!
iPhone: First eBook On It?
iPhone Death Star Upgrade Coming
Mucho Namaste To FSJ!
Will Apple Steal The eBook Limelight From Sony And Create Another Mass Market?